writterings:

groot-scamander:

penny-anna:

penny-anna:

thescarletpaperback:

penny-anna:

tehri:

penny-anna:

Boromir: *taking off boots after a long day questing* ahh

A hobbit: o_o

Boromir: yes?

Hobbits: o_o o_o

Boromir: can i… Help you?

Hobbits: o_o o_o o_o o_o

Boromir: …

Hobbits: o__o o__o o__o o__o

Boromir: please stop looking at my feet like that you are making me VERY uncomfortable

Hobbits: >_> <_< >_> <_<

Pippin: stars above your poor feet

Frodo: Pippin!

Merry: Aren’t they cold?!

Frodo: MERRY!

Pippin: They’re so small!

Frodo: YOU DON’T JUST SAY THAT TO SOMEONE

Merry: You and Sam are thinking the same thing!

Frodo: I am most certainly no-

Sam: I am.

Frodo: please excuse them none of us have ever seen a big person’s feet before

Boromir: I am putting my boots back on

Pippin: lookit those little toes!!!

Boromir: (slaps hand away)

Pippin: aww c’mon. If you let me touch your toes, I’ll let you touch mine!!

Boromir: 

Pippin: I’m so sorry for your loss, I will always remember your brother fondly as the first Big Person whose naked feet I saw

Faramir: please don’t do that

Bold of this to assume Gandalf hasn’t allowed himself to go barefoot in Hobbiton at least once in his life

bold of you to assume gandalf has feet

pendragonqueen09:

jagarsjora:

grumpyoldgermanwoman:

incurablenecromantic:

“Old friend” either means an elderly dog or an individual of the same gender with whom you have been secretly in love for more than a decade. There are no other possible interpretations.

This is blatant archenemy erasure and I won’t stand for it

Bold of you to assume the archenemy isn’t the individual of the same gender you’ve been secretly in love with for more than a decade

Bold of you to assume the archenemy isn’t an elderly dog

variastrix:

justsomeantifas:

i’m so sick of news articles that look like this 

it builds itself up like OKAY WE FOUND THESE DEVASTATING RESULTS

and then you go in to look and you find it had a sample size of 40 

and then you’re like okay, what was the fantastic difference between these 40 people when sleeping with and without a dog

and the article is like

…so you get through it and you’re like you’re trying to tell me you think this is substantial in any capacity, this 40 sample size 3% difference ass bullshit??????????? you fucking shitforbrick bad at math fake ass science losers?